Beginner’s Luck

bradshaw

If Collins’ first year ends the same way Daz’s did, Temple fans would probably sign for that Beginner’s Luck now.

When it comes to speculating on the kind of Beginner’s Luck Geoff Collins might have compared to, say, Matt Rhule, Steve Addazio or Al Golden, the old Brooklyn Dodgers’ owner Branch Rickey quote comes to mind:

“Luck is the residue of design.”

Arguably, Golden, Rhule and Addazio all had a good design going into their first seasons but there is something about this Collins guy that stands out—at least in my mind.

Golden had a 32-page binder on how to build a football program from the ground up, everything from recruiting to dealing with the press and parents and hiring a coaching staff. He started behind the eight-ball, though, as he was following an 0-11 season by Bobby Wallace and had a lot of leftover JUCOs in program.

So Al gets a pass.

Addazio succeeded Golden and Collins reminds me more of Daz than Rhule or Golden in the sense that he seems to have a workable plan that would lead to success in the first year. Addazio wanted to run the ball and had a big offensive line and a high NFL draft pick in Bernard Pierce. With that, and with Chris Coyer at quarterback, the Owls won their first bowl game in 30 years.

Things fell apart for Daz in Year Two when the Owls graduated to the Big East and he stubbornly stuck with the run against better personnel groups that were geared to stop it.

Rhule was all over the map in his first year, and probably went against logic by promoting Connor Reilly over the bowl-winning quarterback he still had on the roster. Many of us felt Rhule had six-win talent his first year and his head-scratching decisions both with personnel and in-game were learning on the job and the 2013 Owls were the Guinea Pigs.

Now Collins has come in with perhaps the best and deepest receiving corps in Temple history, a fine defensive line and secondary and a four quarterbacks who should not be THAT much of a dropoff from P.J. Walker. The receivers will help this new quarterback, whoever he might be. The lead running back, Ryquell Armstead, is outstanding, and that should help as well. The only question marks are the offensive line and linebackers, but they were quite good in the spring. What the OL lacks in talent, it makes up in experience and what the LBs lack in experience, they make up in talent.

Collins has a formula for success and a lot of pathways to it.  He has closely studied past Temple game film in a way other Temple coaches have not. Just last week, Collins said Sharif Finch was the best player on the field in a 2015 win over Penn State. If he’s going back and watching 2015 game film, his preparation and design is probably outstanding and comparable to what Daz’s staff—which had several key members of a national championship Florida team—did his first season.

As Temple center John Palumbo told his dad during Addazio’s first season, “Dad, it’s night and day between these guys and Golden. These are SEC coaches. They know what they are doing.”

Collins, a SEC coach, probably knows what he’s doing, too.

That’s why my gut tells me.

It could be indigestion, but I doubt it.

 

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Beginner’s Luck

  1. Collins has the deepest first year roster of all those before him…., including the most important skill position in football…, all four QBs have little game experience so you might as well go with the guy most capable of making big
    plays and pulling an upset at South Bend

    the jury is out on both coordinators, they won’t be around next year if they don’t produce., don’t see foolish stubbornness in CC.., remember Taggart at USF fired both coordinators before they enjoyed success, think CC will be inclined to do the same since neither was his first choice….,

  2. I wanted Rhule fired during his first year and look how that turned out, and Bill Belichick was 41-55 his first six years as HC. Having realistic expectations is a virtue.

    • Dave: Of course we wanted Rhule fired because he was way out of his league the first two years. He deserved to be fired and would have been at a P-5 school. His inexperience cost the Owls eight winnable games those first two years and a bowl game the second year, His youth caused him to play an offense ill-suited for his talent simply because it was the offense in vogue in college football at the time. It was only after he matured and became more at ease with making decisions did the Owls turn it around. Collins is much older than Rhule was when Rhule took the job and has executive experience in arguably the toughest league. I truly believe that he will make far less mistakes than Rhule did because of that experience. I hope I’m right. He does have an out though because his QB, whoever that is, will be starting for the first time. I have faith though that whomever he selects, will be ready.

      • Matt ‘Mulligans’ Rhule was a good match at Temple. I concur with Mike and think Collins will have a great year and be gone. Like the 23 Trolley gone off the track. He’s gone, gone.

      • I hate to say it, but it’s 50-50 that this guy makes the bowl game if we win the AAC. If there was any coach that was a lifer at Temple after Hardin, it was Rhule and his departure really makes me a cynic for any of his followers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s